Incidence of surgical wound infection in renal surgery. The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis appropriateness. A prospective cohort study. / Incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica en cirugía renal. Efecto de la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica. Estudio de cohortes prospectivo.

OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for patients who underwent renal surgery and its effect on the incidence of surgical wound infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study and assessed the overall compliance and each aspect of the antibiotic prophylaxis (start, administration route, antibiotic of choice, duration and dosage) and reported the compliance rates. The qualitative variables were compared with the chi-squared test, and the quantitative variables were compared with Student's t-test. We studied the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance on the incidence of surgical wound infection in renal surgery, with the relative risk. RESULTS: The study included 266 patients, with an overall compliance rate of 90.6%. The major cause of noncompliance (3.8%) was the start of the prophylaxis, and the incidence rate of surgical wound infections was 3.4%. We found no relationship between antibiotic prophylaxis noncompliance and surgical wound infections (RR=0.26; 95%CI: 0.1-1.2; P>.05). Laparoscopic surgery had a lower incidence of surgical wound infections than open surgery (RR=0.10; 95%CI: 0.01-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was high. The incidence of surgical site infection was low, and there was no relationship between the incidence of surgical site infection and antibiotic prophylaxis compliance. The incidence of infection was lower in laparoscopic surgery.

Influence of the location and number of metastases in the survival of metastatic prostatic cancer patients. / Influencia de la localización y del número de metástasis en la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer seems to be modulated by factors such as the number and site of metastases. Our objective is to evaluate survival outcomes according to the number and site of metastases in our series of metastatic patients over the last 15 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2014. We analyzed overall survival and progression-free survival, depending on the number and location of metastases on patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Other potential prognostic factors were also evaluated: age, clinical stage, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason, PSA nadir, time till PSA nadir and first-line or second-line treatment after progression. RESULTS: We analyzed a series of 162 patients. The mean age was 72.7yr (SD: 8.5). The estimated median overall survival was 3.9 yr (95% CI 2.6-5.2). The overall survival in patients with only lymph node metastases was 7 yr (95% CI 4.1-9.7), 3.9 (95%CI 2.3-5.5) in patients with only bone metastases, 2.5 yr (95% CI 2-2.3) in lymph nodes and bone metastases, and 2.2 yr (95% CI 1.4-3) in patients with visceral metastases (P<.001). In multivariate analysis, the location of metastasesis significantly associated with overall survival and progression-free survival. The number of metastases showed no association with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The site of metastases has a clear impact on both overall survival and progression-free survival. Patients with only lymph node involvement had a better prognosis. The number of metastases showed no significant impact on survival in our series.

Diagnostic yield and complications of extended lymphadenectomy versus limited lymphadenectomy combined with radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer (PC) is the most reliable procedure for detecting lymphatic metastases. The optimal extension of this procedure is still a topic of debate. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the diagnostic performance and complications of extended lymphadenectomy (ELD) and limited lymphadenectomy (LLD) in a series of patients with high-risk PC who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with high d'Amico risk who underwent RP with lymphadenectomy between 1999 and 2014. A comparative analysis was performed of the diagnostic capacity of lymphatic metastases of ELD and LLD and of postoperative complications at 90 days. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were analysed, 20 (21.5%) and 73 (78.5%) of whom underwent ELD and LLD, respectively. The mean age of the series was 65.26 years (SD, 5.51). The median follow-up was 1.51 (0.61-2.29) years in the ELD group and 5.94 (3.61-9.10) in the LLD group. The median number of nodes obtained was 13 (9-23) in the ELD group compared with 5 (2-8) in the LLD group (p <.001). The percentages of patients with positive nodes in the ELD and LLD groups were 35% and 5.47%, respectively (p <.001). The overall complication rate at 90 days was 35.5% (33 patients). In the ELD group, 12 patients (60%) had complications, compared with 21 patients (28.8%) in the LLD group (p=.016), with no significant differences in severity according to the Clavien scale (p=.73). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, the detection of metastatic nodes was significantly greater with ELD. ELD increases the number of complications, with no differences compared with LLD in severity according to the modified Clavien scale.

Changes in Gleason score grading on serial follow-up biopsies in prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance for prostate cancer has grown systematically in the recent years with more robust mid-term outcomes. However, changes in Gleason score during serial biopsies are not detailed in many of these reports. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in Gleason score on follow-up biopsies in low-risk prostate cancer in patients undergoing AS program in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Series of patients diagnosed of prostate cancer between 2004 and 2013 have been analyzed. The inclusion criteria were: PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml + Gleason ≤ 6 + T1c/T2a + ≤ 2 positive cores, and no more than 50% of affected core. The pathology of each of the biopsies was analyzed. RESULTS: We studied a series of 175 patients undergoing AS. Mean follow-up was 3.96 years (SD 2.4). Follow-up biopsies with Gleason scores ≥ 7 were: 5.72% in the first biopsy, 7.39% and 7.41% in subsequent biopsies. By contrast, in 42.03% of cases did not show evident tumor involvement in the first biopsy, 40.74% and 51.85% in the second and third biopsies respectively. Median stay in the AS program was: 90.99 months (95% CI: 53.53-128.46) in patients with first positive biopsy vs. 96.66 months (95% CI: 63.19-130.13) in those without evidence of tumor. CONCLUSIONS: In our series the pathological data of the first 3 biopsies remain stable in terms of the positive biopsy rate, Gleason score, or indication of active treatment proportions. Those patients who do not show evidence of malignancy in the first follow-up biopsy are less likely to need active treatment than the other patients in the series.

Optimization of an early discharge program after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of hospital discharge 24 hours after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and to identify possible factors associated with longer hospital stays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy consecutively between May of 2007 and December of 2010. Those patients who met the following requirements were discharged in less than 24 hours: absence of complications, drainage debit minor than 50 cc, normal oral tolerance, no significant bladder haematuria and good functional recovery. Logistic regression analysis was conducted in order to assess the possible associated variables with longer hospital stays. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients were analysed. The follow-up median was 34 months. Eighty patients (30.1%) were discharged in less than 24 hours. Average stay (SD) of all series was 2.9 days (3.08). Solely HTA, neurovascular bundles sparing and the development of lymphadenectomy were statistically significant between both groups in univariate analysis (discharge<24 hours vs. discharge>24 hours). In multivariate analysis, only HTA (OR=1.98 [CI 95%:1.13-3.47], P=.016) and lymphadenectomy performance (OR=2.56 [CI 95%:1.18-5.56] P=.017) were independent predictive variables of hospital stays longer than 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Early hospital discharge of patients underwent to LRP is feasible and safe. In our series, the lymphadenectomy performance and the HTA were associated factors to longer hospital stay.

Oncological outcomes in patients potentially eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differences in the oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (adverse pathology and biochemical recurrence) based on clinical selection criteria used in two active surveillance (AS) protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 442 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (CP) underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between August 2003 and December 2009. We selected patients with low-risk CP, which could have been included in an AS program. Patients were divided into two groups: group i, those who met the most strict surveillance criteria described by Epstein (PSAD<.15; T1/T2a;<2 positive core, Gleason≤6,<50% involvement of the core) and group ii, those meeting the more open criteria described by Klotz (PSA≤10 or<15 at age 70, Gleason≤6 or<7 [3+4] in over 70 years). We compared both groups to determine differences in pathological stage, positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 442 patients 48% (213 patients) had low-risk PC, and become potential candidates for an AS program. Of the patients operated on 17% (76 patients) met the criteria for AS as of Epstein's and 48% (213 patients) according to Klotz. Comparing patients in both groups there were no statistically significant differences in the presence of pT3 (7.9% vs 10.8%) P=.55, positive margins (22.4% vs. 28.3%) P=.41, nor in biochemical recurrence at 3 years (5.3% vs 5.6%) P=.86. CONCLUSIONS: In our series of patients theoretically candidates for inclusion in a program of active surveillance, we found no differences in the percentage of patients with pathological stage pT3, positive margins and biochemical recurrence according to clinical inclusion criteria currently used.

Safety of active surveillance program for recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with a select group of patients with low-risk tumors included in an observation and monitoring program after the diagnosis of recurrence. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with recurrent, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer maintained under an active surveillance protocol. The inclusion criteria were papillary tumors with negative cytology findings, previous nonmuscle-invasive tumor (Stage pTa, pT1a), grade 1-2, size <1 cm, and number of tumors <5. No symptomatic patients or those with carcinoma in situ or grade 3 tumors were included. A retrospective analysis of a control group of patients with clinical characteristics similar to those of the patients on active surveillance, but who underwent transurethral resection immediately after the recurrence was diagnosed was also performed. RESULTS: The data from 64 patients (70 observation events) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 66.7 years. The median follow-up was 38.6 months. The median time patients remained in observation was 10.3 months. The tumor histologic features before observation were Stage pTa in 77.1%, Stage pT1a in 22.9%, grade 1 in 67.1%, and grade 2 in 23%. After 10.3 months, 93.5% of the patients had not progressed in stage and 83.8% had not progressed in grade. None of the patients experienced progression to muscle-invasive disease. A comparison between the rates of progression in the study and control groups showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent, small (<1 cm), nonmuscle-invasive bladder tumors can be safely offered monitoring under an active surveillance protocol, with a minimal risk of progression in either grade or stage, thus reducing the amount of surgical intervention they might undergo throughout their life.